Whilst studying my GCSE’s I took part in the
stock market challenge which involved schools all across the UK competing
against the market and against the other teams to earn the best return on their
investment. I naturally invested my money into companies that were doing well
following the past market trends believing that I was bound to be successful
because I wasn’t making any stupid decisions. So how did the group that won the
trip to New York win?
I put it down to luck investing in risky
companies could have led to their investment going either way because you can’t
predict that a struggling companies shares would suddenly be successful. Kendal
found that prices changed in a random fashion and there is no link between one
share price and the next. I knew this and so believing it was down to luck I
went for low risk companies but received low return.
So this lead to my next question how can I
get guaranteed high returns with low risk? This is a question I never really
knew the answer to until my lecture on portfolio theory. Portfolio theory was
developed in 1952 by Markowitz and in simple terms it suggests investors can
reduce risk by diversification and holding a portfolio of investments.
An example of how this works can go back to
the banking crisis if you had invested in Lloyds bank shares in 2007 there were
around the price of 434.48 GBX a share and 2 years later the price dropped to
21.97 GBX. Leading to a huge loss for an investor; at the same time investing
in gold from 2007 to 2011 you would have tripled your money. Having both of
theses in your portfolio the gold price would have helped cancel out the loses
made with the Lloyds shares. In one of the articles I read in my seminar many
economists including the creator of this theory say the importance of
diversifying into a number of areas.
Even good old Lizzy is at it? Granted the
Queen will have the best advisors sorting her investment portfolio which
includes art, property, UK bonds and equities. These have all been good
investments; the price of older houses in the UK matched the capital value of
shares (not including dividends). However a lot of the queens investments are
expensive to manage and harder to trade (not many people are going to buy a
3000 carat diamond). This has led to the monarchy starting to diversify by
including foreign assets and shares.
Should you do this too? In my opinion to have
a diverse portfolio means it is necessary to go international; as for a
portfolio to reduce the risk of an investment the correlation between
investments cannot be positive. This means that you need to invest in things
that won’t be affected by each other so the broader your portfolio the better.
Maybe if I had known about portfolio theory
when I did the stock market challenge I would invested in a greater range of
companies and I'd have been the one that won the trip to New York.
Having an international portfolio is
necessary to guarantee returns; the queen has started to do this and I think
you should too! Don’t leave it down to
luck.
Thank you for reading, any comments are
greatly appreciated
No comments:
Post a Comment